Friday, 29 December 2023
European Encounters [2]
Monday, 25 December 2023
European Encounters [1]
Friday, 8 December 2023
Slow Travel in Torino
Saturday, 11 November 2023
Of Milestones and Friendships
I don’t know that I approach turning forty with as much thought as some others before me have done. I feel like I have good ethics of learning, which is to say I’m willing to expand my focus when needed (or desired) in any number of directions. That is one thing I can congratulate myself on for cultivating: a solid foundation geared towards flexibility.
Perhaps I can narrow my focus a little bit and meditate upon something I learnt in the last 12 months, which is the importance of losing interest in patterns, no matter how pervasive, that animated my past, but no longer serve me.
An old friend got back in touch with me and tried to re-establish our old dynamic. I felt myself recoil, because, while I did not know it at the time, that dynamic was infused with toxic positivity and psychological manipulation.
Something which once felt comforting, convivial and creatively inspiring, now felt like I was abandoning myself, and submitting to some kind of mental control. It was scary.
I had to say goodbye. I did not offer an explanation, though I felt guilty about the suddenness of my departure.
What I can offer now is a statement of what I want out of friendships:
- I want that person to value honesty, even when it’s uncomfortable and has potential to create negative feelings
- I want that person to be a feminist, because I treat myself as the equal of men, and I want my friend to also value my full humanity
- I want that person to have progressive values. The more progressive, the better.
- I want that person to be interested in international travel (regardless of how often they can get away)
I can say that, whatever else I may have learnt, making and enforcing boundaries in my friendships is going to serve me well for the next however many years I have to live.
Thank you, Epiphanie. Well done!
Tuesday, 31 October 2023
Still Childfree and Living Well
At the end of a three day stay in Cassis, a colourful village in the south of France, my AirBnB host and I were sitting at her kitchen table, having tea, and sharing stories about our lives. At some point she asked me if I had children, and seeing as the question seemed weighed down by pro-natalist expectations, I thought it would be a good idea to lower my head a little (just so) after I said no. There was a brief pause, after which my rebellious streak won over: returning my head to its previous position, I looked at her in the eyes with a no-nonsense look… “And you?”
A little surprised at my shift in attitude, she answered in the affirmative, and told me that her son inspires her to be a more empathetic person. I liked her stories about him, and it’s always nice to know about happy family relationships. I said something to this effect.
My host was a nice person who hadn’t travelled recently. She couldn’t afford to. I was a window into an Australian living a different kind of lifestyle, my personality shaped by a variety of globe-trotting adventures which I draw upon for personal development, self-care, education, entertainment, and more. When I left I thought I could see some envy in her eyes, even though I must confess I envied her in turn - Cassis is a charming place to live.
Anyway, as I write I am in a cosy hotel room in Torino (Turin, Italy). I’ve been in Europe for about six weeks, and in the last two weeks I dived into a southern French adventure, admiring the art and architecture of Marseille, Cassis, Aix-en-Provence, Arles and Carcassonne.
My slow travels are emerging now, as I get ready to spend my fifth night in Torino, reasserting my need for beautiful surroundings and intriguing masterpieces.
I am where I want to be, and that does not involve making babies. My body is benefitting from delicious culinary offerings, walking around streets once new but now increasingly familiar, and relaxing in my room when I’m interacting with my friends, family, or writing a piece like this blog post.
The life I find most meaningful - a life of regular travel - isn’t a life I could lead if I were to be responsible for a young person. I am grateful for my ability to choose who I want to be, and I choose to be childfree every time.
Friday, 29 September 2023
Some Thoughts on Living a Good Life
Most of the texts I’ve consumed about being single seem to be about the author consoling themselves that they are living a good life *even though they’re not in a relationship*. But living well, to me, looks like focusing on what you *do* have. Being single isn’t a consolation prize - it’s making yourself your top priority: time and time again. I’m ideally situated to nurture and protect myself, and sometimes I have found relationships a distraction from this.
I’m still open to romantic partnerships, but they can be a restriction… any commitment necessarily means limiting your options accordingly.
So then, what does self-appreciation look like for me?
This year I am having a new overseas travel experience: Staying in Germany for the better part of autumn. I’ve had a rocky start, getting sick with an infection, but I’ve officially started enjoying myself, talking to strangers (including Bulgarian speakers), baking sweet potato rosti bought fresh from the supermarket, admiring the tasteful and stylish way people dress in Hannover, ogling everything from Peruvian ornaments in the Landesmuseum to the impressive collection of Abstractionist paintings in the Sprengel Museum… All of this would be rewarding on its own, but the raspberry on top is spending time with my best friend, with his kindness and originality. Being a writer, he expresses himself beautifully through (Facebook) Messenger, but it’s with renewed delight that I watch his facial expressions and body language change in real time!
Wednesday, 23 August 2023
Poem [Untitled]
Where were you before?
We'd anticipated your presence
Enjoying the glossy finish of the pavement
Many months I've frowned at sun
Where moody greys could have added texture
Familiar rage in the form of storms
Was not to be
This paltry attempt at precipitation
I squint out my window, but
It's already gone
I'm left to wander - dry and forlorn.
Tuesday, 8 August 2023
In Defence of Pleasure
Who doesn’t enjoy biting into the layers of sugary goodness that is a freshly baked - and artfully presented - French pastry?
Who doesn’t savour every subliminally sexy beat of an original song that wafts over the radio at the right moment?
Women and non-binary people who fear being perceived as desiring too much, that’s who.
As Laurie Penny would say, women(, non-binary people and other feminised people) are relegated the role of being the desired object under patriarchy. It is far less socially acceptable for them to be doing the desiring! To welcome our natural and healthy desires becomes a work in progress, for those of us who aren’t willing to let patriarchy undermine our humanity.
I am not immune to censoring or downplaying my desires. I sometimes have a desire to lick my lips, when sharing good conversation with a friendly and attractive individual. This is socially acceptable in Europe, where people are more relaxed about incorporating sensuality in casual or friendly social interaction… and ‘uncomfortably provocative’ with most people in Australia. So I either feel like I’m suppressing my sensuality, or feeling non-verbally slut-shamed.
What I try to do is find novel ways to be intellectually stimulated and/or emotionally moved, in my daily conversations here. The pleasure of ideas, collaborated upon with people with different conceptual strengths (and weaknesses), is worth the effort.
But sometimes I can’t be bothered hiding sensual impulses when they arise. One way I can tell if I’m going to feel comfortable with someone in the long run, is if they’re laidback about me expressing a subtle kind of eroticism.
Something I feel more confident about is my tendency to frequently savour sweet treats, and indulge in the pleasures of arousing music. Maybe women, non-binary people and other feminised people can co-conspire and build each other up to find as much pleasure in life as possible. (Each of us has tips and tricks we can share.)
One leisurely afternoon in a LGBTIQ+ bookshop, my browsing took me to a chapter on masturbation in a book about women’s pleasure. And there was an idea there worth relaying: “How often should you masturbate? How much pleasure are you worth?”
Grab pleasure back from the patriarchy. Consult with other women and non-binary people on how to live life to your full potential. You have the power to work within the inevitable daily limitations, to experience as much pleasure as you could humanly want.
Tuesday, 25 July 2023
The Illusion of Moral Cohesion
I sometimes think many of us feel an imperative to represent ourselves as having moral cohesion.
I don’t know about you, but my moral life is messy at the best of times. Let’s get specific by choosing a way in which I strive to be moral, but frequently disappoint myself: in living an anti-racist life.
There are things I do which I can say are oriented towards relating to different cultures and/or ethnicities, staying open to people of colour as they feel emboldened to be authoritative in ways which white Australians might censor or negate… when I locate that tendency to censor and negate within myself, I try to a) calm down, and b) ask questions which can get me to a more accepting place. The goal is to create space for people of colour to be themselves - messy, imperfect, variable - and still worthy.
Now, I have personally benefitted from the knowledge of many feminists of colour, such as Bell Hooks, AudrĂ© Lorde and Sara Ahmed… But…
In my messiness, I have not always been able to be as generous to someone like Sara Ahmed as I can now see as ideal. For example, I articulated to myself the value of analysing the emotional states that feminism often results in (Sara writes of feeling like an ‘affect alien’ in ‘Living a Feminist Life’, describing, for example, feeling out of sync with the rest of society as they might laugh at a joke in which the punch line depends of gender stereotypes). But for ages I put undue focus on what I regarded as the least rewarding part of the book, its word-play.
Browsing through Amazon.com reviews of ‘Living a Feminist Life’, I noted that just about everybody else was too enthralled with the revolutionary insights of the narrative to bother complaining at all. But, reader, I insisted that what I now experience as a minor flaw, ought to be duly called out. This eventually ended with me being passive-aggressive to a feminist I met on the internet who had noted that Sara Ahmed was one of her favourite authors. I regret this.
Rather than a tidy, open-and-closed case of me having been morally dubious (being overly critical of a Black woman, then being micro-aggressive to a woman of colour about it), and having atoned for it by recognising my rightful position as an admirer and amplifier of Ahmed’s work, and going forth into the world with more ardent anti-racism… I don’t mind sharing that I have made similar mistakes since, and will probably continue to make them in the future.
I strive to be fair and just to everybody, but is it even realistic to expect constant adherence to this perfectionistic standard? As a white person in a white supremacy, I am a product of my environment, and I unconsciously act out what I have been taught… until I catch myself in the act, back off, get calm… and curious. Reflect, and change… Then reinforce the strengths in my anti-racism and expand upon them.
But one thing I cannot offer is moral certitude, moral cohesion, or moral consistency. If my morality is a painting, it is constantly rearranging itself. Sometimes I am pleased with myself. Sometimes I am not. I notice I am more pleased if I opt out of representing myself as morally cohesive. Removing the pressure to be perfect creates space for more self-compassion, and giving myself permission to fail ironically gives me more freedom to take more risks. Self-compassion and a growth mindset helps me grow: as an anti-racist and as a person with moral agency.
Morally messy - that is how I am. It’s a relief to be open about it, and it would make me happy if I could encourage someone to feel more comfortable with their messy, ambiguous self. I am still worthy - and so are you.
Friday, 21 July 2023
Some Further Thoughts on Travel
Tuesday, 4 July 2023
Reflecting on Travel Privilege
Monday, 15 May 2023
Trans Literacy & Feminism
It’s still popular to refer to the “opposite” sex (or gender), which represents the idea that femininity and masculinity are mutually exclusive. But when I think of a trans person, I see their capacity for a variety of gender performances. They contain multitudes? Their body is the site of aspects of both what is considered traditionally feminine and traditionally masculine?
There are no two trans people alike, but a feminist trans woman doesn’t change from considering herself a full (non-objectified) human being to a being that is as a collection of body parts (which must all be embellished to make them acceptable to the heterosexual male gaze). One would hope that the feeling that one is an integral, coherent organism would stay with her, no matter the new standard the world offers when she starts presenting as a woman.
To be awake to the possibilities of all things transgender is to enhance one’s feminism. It’s like a superpower. When emotions (like anger, or crying in sadness) aren’t tethered to gender, emotions can proliferate. Any person can contain the full emotional spectrum. Right now a traditionally gendered person cannot legibly claim possession of the full emotional spectrum, e.g. the ability to punch a wall in anger AND weep openly in public.
As far away as it may seem, I still think the best thing we can do for public health is to transition into a gender neutral society. Let today’s extremes of femininity and masculinity fade away. I, for one, won’t miss them. In my ideal future, I regard myself as an authoritative being, and am regarded as such by the people I come into contact with. I relate to those beings with kindness and empathy, humour and integrity. I have more freedom to move because my gender performance is not policed.
I think the more trans literate you are, the more pathways you create for reaching your full potential as a human.
Wednesday, 19 April 2023
How do Australians with low self-esteem navigate its socially levelling philosophy?
I am an Australian with low self-esteem who has gotten to know other people in the same position, and I'm curious about how we make the socially levelling philosophy (pejoratively known as Tall Poppy Syndrome) work to our advantage.
Perhaps I should begin by clarifying that, while 'Tall Poppy Syndrome' is the most popular way to address this unspoken rule of Australian social life, I will be looking at the positive aspects in this post, so I'll be using the more neutral term, 'socially levelling philosophy' - or SLP.
Observing my community, there are people who 'lean in' to the SLP more than others - those that find it's in their interest to find their rightful place in an egalitarian social structure. In my personal experience, it's the people who are socio-economically disadvantaged and/or who have low self-esteem who find the most to gain by associating themselves with this policy.
The SLP instructs us that everybody, no matter how inadequate they may feel, has the right to perform a certain amount of pride (not too much, but not too little) simply by virtue of belonging to the society. We have the right to act 'like a standard member of Team Australia' despite depression, anxiety, or more severe mental illness. Whenever we feel besmirched, we can always (signal that we) fall back on this social principle, to elicit the respect desired.
To signal that we are as worthy members of society as the average person is a way of attaching ourselves to external standards of worth, yet we have learned that we get better treatment when we appeal to others' sense of egalitarianism. Little wonder, then, that we develop a liking for (sometimes dependency on?) the SLP as a way to work the system in our favour, and regulate our emotions.
(If you identify as 'the underdog', there are also avenues you know you can take to boost your standing in society, particularly by appealing to people's sense of the underdog. It's a kind of self-consciousness which binds us to other people, helping us meet our need to be respected. I'm glad it's there for me when I need it.)
I once had a relationship with someone who was in a stigmatised minority group (or three - they were trans, a lesbian and on welfare), and one thing that we recognised in each other is how strongly we relied on the SLP to elicit a sense of worthiness and belonging from other Australians. We never verbally addressed the link between our low self-esteem and this 'urge not to stand out with negative consequences', but I believe it was an important part of our connection.
In a similar vein, I notice people of all kinds of minority groups speaking up and asserting their right to be treated like the status quo - whether they be people of colour reminding a white person that they, too, deserve be taken seriously, or a person who is physically disabled keeping their head up high in their wheelchair, and speaking with accentuated authority. We all adopt our mechanisms for reminding more privileged people that we are owed that specific amount of respect that is the social contract of having an Australian identity.
In an ideal world, I wouldn't need to reference an external set of guidelines to enjoy better treatment, but we do not live in an ideal world. Class divisions within Australia are real (and income inequality, for one, is growing). I have a certain amount of affection for the socially levelling philosophy which allows me to navigate the world with a little more respect and dignity, though. This is why I choose to call it 'the socially levelling philosophy' and not 'Tall Poppy Syndrome'. I feel that it softens the blow of belonging to a variety of marginalised groups, and offers a way to relate to other Australians despite differences such as class and mental health status.
Sunday, 12 March 2023
The Right to be Hairy
Q: Why should there be one set of rules for cis men's leg and underarm hair, and another for cis women's and non-binary people's?
*
Ever since teenagerhood I've observed the growth of innocent little hairs over my legs and underarms, and wondered why people waste time and money on obliterating their existence. The natural function of body hair is to allow the retention of heat, and to show that the individual has reached a certain maturity in their development. Yet we are taught to revile body hair in approximately half the population.
When it became apparent that all my schoolfriends were mercilessly waging war on their bodies, I half-heartedly figured I'd join them. I tried creams which were messy, time-consuming and immobilised me physically for the amount of time it took for them to kick in. They achieved the desired effect - for a few days, that is. After that, it was time to repeat it all like a good masochist. I thought perhaps waxing would get it over with quicker - surely it couldn't be so painful if it was wildly popular? But it turned out that the pain was as acute as I had initially guessed. Why were so many of us willing to submit ourselves to this torture? I decided never to tear out my hair from the roots again. After a while the annoyance of using the creams led me to meditate on the regrowth and decide... what would be so bad about leaving it there? It seemed to resurface for a reason, and it wasn't bothering me. I would let nature run its course.
Due to attending a selective all-girls high school, most of my friends declined from commenting on my legs, but I did have an unpleasant experience when one acquaintance pointed to them and laughed. However, I felt comfortable enough in my own skin to shrug it off. I even believe I got the last laugh, because I have rejected the shame the patriarchy encourages me to feel. On the contrary, I feel proud of what I have achieved in integrating my body hair into a positive self-image. These days I mostly wear long pants, but on the occasion that my leg hair is visible in public I emotionally prepare myself for occasional derision from strangers, knowing that I am strong enough to handle it.
It occurs to me that subscribers to the patriarchy prefer not to treat cis women as mature, grown, full human beings. They would rather infantilise and patronise them. A cis woman without body hair looks (and feels) more like a pre-pubescent girl than an adult. It's easier to treat her like an immature or underdeveloped being whose function is to be restricted, controlled and dehumanised.
I have different ideas about the way I show up in the world. I surround myself with people who respect what I do (or, in this case, what I don't do) with my body. My friendships are egalitarian. If I'm to have a relationship in the future, it will be with someone who treats me as an equal, whether their gender predisposes them to this or not. I consider life to be too short not to allow my body hair take up its rightful place in it. I hope I can inspire my readers to revise the way they see norms and beauty standards around this.